THE PALIYAR, THE INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIANS AND THE ETERNAL SUBJECTS

Скачать pdf
Альманах
Key words
hunter/gatherer peoples, the Aboriginal Australia, the Paliyar, different ways of social evolution
Author
ARTEMOVA OL'GA
About the Author
ARTEMOVA OL'GA
About the author: е-mail: artemova.olga@list.ru

Tel.: +7 (495) 954 76 36;

Leninsky Prospect 32 a, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation;

Full Professor (History), Professor, Research Fellow, the Institute of Ethnology and

Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences; Deputy Director of t h e Center of Social

Anthropology, the Russian State University for Humanities.
Body

The article represents the results of long-term study aimed at understanding the R commonalities and diversities in the social systems of a number of hunter/gatherer peoples as they are reflected in professional ethnological (socio-anthropological) literature. The cultures of the Paliyar people of South India and some traditional societies of the Aboriginal Australia are compared by the author with a special theoretical interest. The author shows that those cultures differed from each other greatly in social organization, stereotypes of communication and spirituality. She argues that cultures under consideration are not only alternative with regard to the systems based on productive economies but also with regard to each other. Even having fundamentally similar modes of subsistence those societies followed different ways in their evolution. The author of the article is attracted to the thoughts of Korotaev, Kradin and Lynsha, according to whom humanity from the very beginning of its history had "unlimited number of evolutionary alternatives" and "choices in concrete historical circumstances were made by societies themselves". Of course, one could perceive these words as a sort of personification of societies implying, what is more, consistency of aims on their part (as if they could have clear aims for a long-range outlook), which is unrealistic and evidently was not meant by the scholars mentioned above. However, it seems to be absolutely obvious, argues the author of the article, that reasonably acting and determined individuals, associated in groups, did make historical choices for short-range perspectives and did that deliberately, generation after generation.

References

Artemova O. Yu. Esau’s Knee. Hunters, Gatherers, Fishermen. Probes of studying Alternative Social System. Moscow, 2009. (in Russ.).

Artemova O. Yu. Primordial Egalitarianism and Early Forms of the Social Disparity. Early Forms of the Social Stratification. Genesis, Historical Dynamics and Potestary-Political Functions. In memoriam of L. E. Kubbel’. Moscow, 1993. Pp. 40—70. (in Russ.).

Artemova O. Yu. Monopolization of information and social inequality. Alternatives of Social Evolution. N. N. Kradin, A. V. Êorotaev and co-authors (Eds.). Vladivostok, 2000. Pp. 132—137.

Artemova O.Yu. Primordial Egalitarian and Non-Egalitarian Societies. Archaic Society: Knot Problems of the Development Sociology. Part 1. Moscow, 1991. Pp. 44—91. (in Russ.).

Cawte J. E. Medicine is the Law. Studies in Psychiatric Anthropology of Australian Tribal Societies. Honolulu, 1974.

Chesling W. Among the Nomads of the Northern Australia. Moscow, 1961. (Russian Translation). Dahl Ê. In Savage Australia. L., 1926. Daimond J. Collapse. How Societies Choose to Fall or Succeed. L., 2005.

Gardner P. M. Bicultural Versatility as a Frontier Adaptation among Paliyan Foragers of South India. Lewiston; New York, 2000.

Gardner P. M. Foragers pursuit of individual autonomy. Current Anthropology. University of Chicago Press. V. 31. 1991. Pp. 543—572.

Gardner P. M. Journeys to the Edge. In the Footsteps of an Anthropologist. Columbia and L., 2006.

Gardner P. M. Rethinking foragers’handling of environmental and subsistence knowledge. Paper presented at CHAGS 9 (Ninth International Conference on Hunting and Gathering Societies, Edinburgh, 9—13 September 2002).

Gardner P. M. Symmetric respect and memorate knowledge: the structure and ecology of individualistic culture. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology. 1966. V. 22. Pp. 389—415.

Gardner P. M. The Paliayans. Hunters and Gatherers Today. Socioeconomic Study of Eleven Such Cultures in the Twentieth Century. M. C. Bic chieri (Eds.). New York, 1972. Pp. 404—450.

Gardner P. M. The Paliyan. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Hunters and Gatherers. R. B. Lee, R. Daly (Eds.).

Cambridge, 1999. Pp. 261—264. Hiatt L. R. The moral lexicon of the Warlpiri people of Central Australia. Australian Aboriginal Studies. 2007. ¹ 1. Pp. 4—30. Keen I. Aboriginal Economy and Society. Oxford; New York, 2004.

Korotaev A. V., Kradin N. N., Lynsha V. A. Social Evolution’s Alternatives (Introductory Notes). Alternative Pathways to Civilization. Moscow, 2000. Pp. 198—206. (in Russ.).

Kubbel’ L. E. Essays on the Potestary-Political Ethnography. Moscow, 1988. (in Russ.).

Lockwood D. I, the Aboriginal. Adelaide, 1962 (Russian translation — 1971). McKnight D. Of Marriage, Violence and Sorcery. The Quest for Power in Northern Queensland. Aldershot, 2005. Mirsa P. K. «The Jenu Kuruba». Bulletin of the Anthropological Survey of India. 1969. V. XVIII (3). Pp. 183—246.

Morris B. The family group structuring and trade among South Indian hunter-gatherers. Politics and History in Band Societies. E. Leacock, R. Lee (Eds.). Cambridge, 1982.

Norström Ch. “They Call for Us”. Strategies for Securing Autonomy among the Paliyans, Hunter-Gatherers of the Palny Hills, South India. Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology, 53. Stockholm, 2003.

Norström Ch. Individualism, collectivism and flexibility: a Paliyan ethos for securing autonomy. Paper presented at CHAGS—9.

Stanner W. E. H. White Man Got no Dreaming. Essays 1938—1973. Canberra, 1979. Pp. 89—102.

Thomson D. Donald Thomson in Arnhem Land. Compiled and introduced by N. Peterson. Melbourne, 2003.