ETHNOGRAPHIC CINEMA IN RUSSIA IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE 20TH CENTURY

Скачать pdf
Альманах
Key words
visual anthropology, intercultural communication in Russia, documentary cinematography
Author
EVGENY V. ALEXANDROV
About the Author
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7726-1466
E-mail: eale@yandex.ru Tel.: +7 (495) 939-32-92
1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation
PhD in Arts, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher of the M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Received
Date of publication
DOI
10.26158/TK.2019.20.4.011
Body

Visual anthropology as a form of intercultural communication arose only in the second half of the 20th century. Before that this role was played by cinema, with a different degree of awareness, trying to increase emerging public consciousness by reflecting on the life of people who were on the periphery of “civilizing” processes. In Russia, where discussion about visual anthropology appeared only in the late 1980s, documentary cinema continues to play a dominant role, significantly influencing the formation of Russian visual anthropology. The goal of this article is to survey the interaction between the socio-cultural, ideological, information and technological processes that took place in the country until the end of the 1940s, when all of its resources were mobilized to participate in the Second World War.

In the pre-revolutionary period, documentary cinema began to perform a cognitive function, which eventually became its main one. Its simple, short, filmed fragments now offer rare evidence of a past way of life. After the Revolution, the new state tasked cinema to help create a “new man”. This goal was taken up by Dziga Vertov, the ideologist of a special vision of reality seen through a film lens who became concerned with the impact of the documentary screen on the viewer. Vertov’s “film truth” became a symbol of exploring the real world using the language of cinema. In particular, his “The Sixth Part of the World” represented an unprecedented attempt to capture the life of different peoples over a vast expanse of the country and inspired other documentary filmmakers to undertake ethnographic photography.

The active growth of cinema in the initial pre-revolutionary period; its obvious achievements in the difficult 1920s; and the alarming trends of the Stalinist 1930s; all provided the background for the development of domestic documentary cinema as intercultural communication during the second half of the 20th century. 

References

Alexandrov E. V. (2017) Tsentrostremitel’nyy vektor v bezgranich’i vizual’noy antropologii [The centripetal vector in limitless visual anthropology]. Sibirskiye istoricheskiye issledovaniya [Siberian historical research]. 2017. No. 3. Pp. 11–28. In Russian.

Arzyutov D. (2016) Etnograf s kinokameroy v rukakh: Prokof’yevy i nachalo vizual’noy antropologii samodiytsev [The ethnographer with a movie camera: The Prokofievs and the beginning of visual anthropology of the Samoyeds]. Antropologicheskiy forum [Forum for anthropology and culture]. 2016. No. 29. Pp. 187–219. In Russian.

Baklin N. V., Kalashnikov A. G. (2003) Per- vyye shagi nauchnogo kino v Rossii [The first steps of scholarly cinema in Russia]. Publ. by A. S. Deryabin; Comment. by S. V. Skovorodnikova and A. S. Deryabin. Kinovedcheskiye zapiski [Film notes]. 2003. No. 64. Pp. 184–189. In Russian.

Batalin V. N., Malysheva G. E. (2011) Istoriya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhiva kinofotodokumentov. 1926–1966 gg. [History of the Russian State Documentary Film and Photo Archive. 1926–1966]. St. Petersburg. In Russian.

Chuyko S. (2019) Tropoy Sakari Pyalsi [On Sakari Pyalsi’s trail]. Krayniy Sever [The Far North]. 2019.18.10. URL: http://www.ks87.ru/82/6983. html (retrieved: 11.02.2019). In Russian.

Czeczot-Gawrak Z. (1995) Bolesław Matuszewski, filozof i pionier dokumentu filmowego [Boleslaw Matuszewski, philosopher and pioneer of documentary cinema]. In: Bolesław Matuszewski. Nowe źródło historii. Ożywiona fotografia, czym jest, czym byc powinna [Boleslaw Matuszewski. A new source of history. A living photograph, what it is and should be]. Warsaw. Pp. 11–12. In Polish. Deryabin A. (1995) Vertov i  Erofeyev: Dve vetvi dokumentalistiki [Vertov and Erofeev: The two branches of the documentary]. In: Katalog 

Flaertiana [Flaertiana catalog]. Perm. Pp. 65–71. In Russian. Deryabin A. (1999) O fil’makh-puteshestviyakh i  Aleksandre Litvinove [About travel films and Alexander Litvinov]. Vestnik “Zelenoye spaseniye” [Bulletin “Green salvation”]. 1999. 
 No. 11. Pp. 14–23. In Russian. Deryabin A. (2001) “Nasha psikhologiya i ikh psikhologiya —  sovershenno raznyye ve- shchi”. “Afganistan” Vladimira Erofeyeva i sovetskiy kul’turfil’m dvadtsatykh godov [“Our psycho- logy and their psychology are completely diffe- rent things”. “Afghanistan” by Vladimir Erofeev and Soviet kulturfilm (culture film) of the twenties]. Kinovedcheskiye zapiski [Film notes]. 2001. No. 54. Pp. 53–70. In Russian.

Gibert G. G., Nyrkova D. A. (2016) Kavkaz v dorevolyutsionnom dokumental’nom kino [Caucasus in pre-revolutionary documentary cinema]. Naslediye vekov [Heritage of centuries]. 2016. No.1. Pp. 70–73. In Russian.

Ginzburg S. (1963) Kinematografiya dorevo- lyutsionnoy Rossii [Cinematography of pre-revolutionary Russia]. Moscow. In Russian.

Golovnev I. (2016) Lesnyye lyudi —  fenomen sovetskogo etnograficheskogo kino [Forest people, the phenomenon of Soviet ethnographic cinema]. Etnograficheskoye obozreniye [Ethnographic review]. 2016. No. 2. Pp. 83–98. In Russian.

Golovneva E. V., Golovnev I. A. (2016) Vizualizatsiya regiona sredstvami kinematografa (na primere “Kinoatlasa SSSR”) [Visualization of a region by means of cinematography (the example of “Kinoatlas of the USSR”)]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta [Proceedings of the Ural Federal University]. Series 1. 2016. No. 22 (3). 
 Pp. 146–151. In Russian. Ishevskaya S., Viren D. (2007) Boleslav Matushevskiy. Zhivaya fotografiya: chem ona yavlyayetsya i chem dolzhna stat’ [Boleslav Matushevskiy, Living photography: what it is and what it should become]. Kinovedcheskiye zapiski [Film notes]. 2007. No. 83. Pp. 127–161. In Russian.

Jacoby J. (1995) Znałem Bolesława Matuszew- skiego [I knew Boleslaw Matuszewski]. In: Bolesław Matuszewski. Nowe źródło historii. Ożywiona fotografia, czym jest, czym byc powinna [Boleslaw Matuszewski. A new source of history. A living photograph, what it is and what it should be]. Warsaw. Pp. 37–42. In Polish.

Lebedev N. A. (1947) Ocherk istorii kino SSSR: Nemoye kino [Essay on the history of cine- ma of the USSR: Silent cinema]. Moscow. In Russian.

Magidov V. M. (1999) Itogi kinematograficheskoy i nauchnoy deyatel’nosti B. Matushevskogo v Rossii [The results of B. Matuszewski’s cinematic and scholarly activities in Russia]. Kinovedcheskiye zapiski [Film notes]. 1999. No. 43. Pp. 268–280. In Russian.

Magidov V. M. (2013) Istochniki o deyatel’nosti Skobelevskogo komiteta i  ego roli v otechestvennom kinoprotsesse nakanune i  v khode Pervoy mirovoy voyny, Fevral’skoy i Oktyabr’skoy revolyutsiy 1917 g. [Sources on the activities of the Skobelevsky Committee and its role in the domestic film process on the eve of and during the First World War, the February and October Revolutions of 1917]. Vestnik arkhivista [Herald of an archivist]. 2013. No. 1 (121). Pp. 65–81. In Russian.

Medvedev M. (2011) Dziga Vertov. Lovets zvukov, ili Doktor Frankenshteyn [Dziga Vertov: The catcher of sounds, or Dr. Frankenstein]. Peremeny [Changes]. 2011.02.01. URL: https://www. peremeny.ru/blog/6704 (retrieved: 14.04.2014). In Russian.

Mislavskiy V. N. (2006) Al’fred Fedetskiy: k biografii pervogo rossiyskogo kinooperatora [Alfred Fedetskiy: Toward the biography of the first Russian cameraman]. Kinovedcheskiye zapiski [Film notes]. 2006. No. 77. Pp. 163–213. In Russian.

Pervyy forum. Sovremennyye tendentsii v antropologicheskikh issledovaniyakh [The first forum. Modern trends in anthropological research] (2004) Antropologicheskiy forum [Forum for anthropology and culture]. 2004. No. 1. Pp. 6–101. In Russian.

Pink S. (2006) The future of visual anthropology: Engaging the senses. London. In English.

Roshal L. (1982) Dziga Vertov [Dziga Vertov]. Moscow, 1982. In Russian. Ruby J. (2004) The anthropology of visual communication at Temple University. 1967 to 2004. A personal view. URL: http://astro.temple.edu/~ruby/vatu/index.htm (retrieved: 05.08.2017). In English.

Vatolin V. (2002) Sinema v Sibiri. Ocherki istorii rannego sibirskogo kino (1896–1917) (Okonchaniye) [Cinema in Siberia. Essays on the history of early Siberian cinema (1896–1917) (Conclusion)]. Kinovedcheskiye zapiski [Film notes]. 2002. No. 61. Pp. 369–370. In Russian.

Vertov D. (1966) Stat’i. Dnevniki. Zamysly [Articles. Diaries. Plans]. Moscow. In Russian.

Vishnevskiy V. E. (1996) Dokumental’nyye fil’my dorevolyutsionnoy Rossii: 1907–1916 [Do- cumentaries of pre-revolutionary Russia: 1907– 1916]. Moscow. In Russian.

Zorkaya N. M. (2005) Istoriya sovetskogo kino [History of Soviet cinema]. St. Petersburg. In Russian. 

For citation

 Alexandrov E. V. Ethnographic cinema in Russia in the first half of the 20th century. Traditional culture. 2019. Vol. 20. No. 4. Pp. 136–147. In Russian.