The Clash of Civilizations: Modernization and Tradition in the Lives of Chumikan Residents

Альманах
Key words
traditional culture, modernization, frontier studies, Tuguro-Chumikan district, biographical method
Author
Maxim S. Mikhalev
About the Author
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5695-6915
E-mail: maxmikhalev@yahoo.com Tel.: +7 (495) 250-61-18
16–1, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125047, Russian Federation
DSc in History, Full Professor, Teaching Scientific Center of Social Anthropology, Russian State University for the Humanities
Received
Date of publication
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26158/TK.2022.23.4.012
Acknowledgements

This article was prepared within the framework of the project “The Role of the Ethnic Factor in Ensuring the National Security of the Russian Federation and the Socio-Economic Development of the Border Territories of Siberia and the Far East” (part of the program of fundamental and applied scientific research, “The Ethno-Cultural Diversity of Russian Society and the Strengthening of the All-Russian Identity,” 2020–2022).

Body

As an addition to the description of the global opposition between civilizations described by Samuel Huntington in his highly acclaimed book “The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order,” this article provides slightly more modest insight into the opposition between civilization masquerading as modernization and the tradition that tries to resist its pressure. To this end, the individual biographies of a Yakut named Ivanov, an Evenk named Chepalov, a Russian named Zhukov and a Latvian named Prus that all used to live or still live in the Tuguro-Chumikan district of Russia’s Khabarovsk Region are examined in order to elaborate on the course of this confrontation. The article suggests that the most effective strategy for those living in zones where modernization and tradition come into conflict is to carefully borrow some of the elements from the opposing camp and make use of the opportunities this provides while keeping close connections to their own culture. If this kind of balance fails, the outcome can be tragic for both the traditional culture (that may simply vanish) and for the expanding civilization. If it goes too far in trying to transform a tradition that opposes it, a civilization may lose touch with its own nature and ultimately be absorbed by the tradition it opposes.

References

Kak segodnya izuchat’ frontiry? Diskussiya po stat’e D. V. Senya [How to Study Frontiers Today? Discussion of the Article by D. V. Sen’] (2020). Peterburgskie slavyanskie i baltiiskie issledovaniya [Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana]. 2020. No. 1 (27). Pp. 81–105. DOI: 10.21638/ spbu19.2020.105. In Russian.

Kappeler A. (2003) Yuzhnyi i vostochnyi frontir Rossii v XVI–XVIII vekakh [The Southern and Eastern Frontier of Russia in the Sixteenth-Eighteenth Centuries]. Ab imperio. 2003. No. 1. Pp. 47–65. DOI: 10.30759/1728–9718–2018–4(61)-72–80. In Russian.

Poberezhnikov I. V. (2018) Frontirnaya modernizatsiya na vostoke Rossiiskoi imperii: regional’nye variatsii [Frontier Modernization in the East of the Russian Empire: Regional Variations]. Ural’skii istoricheskii vestnik [Ural Historical Herald]. 2018. No. 4 (61). Pp. 72–80. In Russian.

For citation

Mikhalev M. S. The Clash of Civilizations: Modernization and Tradition in the Lives of Chumikan Residents. Traditional Culture. 2022. Vol. 23. No. 4. Pp. 150–159. In Russian.