Tradition and Modernity in the Work of Komi Storytellers (SUS 502 “Copper Forehead”)

Скачать pdf
Альманах
Key words
Komi folktale, plot history, variant, plot type, comparative analysis.
Author
Nadezhda S. Korovina
About the Author
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8117-0180
E-mail: nadezhdakorovina@mail.ru Tel.: +7 (8212) 20-17-02
26, Kommunisticheskaya str., Syktyvkar, 167982, Russian Federation
PhD in Philology, Senior Researcher, Folklore Department, Institute of Linguistics, Literature and History, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences
Received
Date of publication
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26158/TK.2021.22.3.005
Body

The strong connection between the Komi and Russian fairy tale traditions has been noted repeatedly, yet research on this issue is clearly insufficient. In this article the author attempts to define the interaction of fairy tales of these neighboring peoples which belong to different linguistic families but which have closely related cultural traditions. Its specific focus is fairy tale SUS number 502 “Copper Forehead.” It examines five Komi variants of the fairy tale that contain all of the significant elements of this plot type. Examination of the Komi material challenges the idea that the laws governing folktales are stable. With the fading of folkloric traditions, there have been changes in fairy tales’ most stable components, their plot and compositional structure. Komi storytellers have introduced changes that transform Komi fairy tales in the direction of “novelization,” turning them to some extent into oral tales of adventure and fantasy. Traditional stories are reinterpreted primarily due to contamination, including bringing folklore tales closer to those from Russian books. At the same time, these normal changes by no means indicate the complete destruction of Komi folklore’s deep traditional basis. The study also demonstrates that Komi storytellers have had a clear notion of traditional fairy-tale patterns and made wide use of them, which has largely contributed to the preservation of the fairy tale as a genre.

References

Barag L. G. (1988) Sostoyanie vostochnoslavyanskoi ustnoi skazochnoi traditsii i sovremennye narodnye skazochniki [The State of the East Slavic Oral Fairy-Tale Tradition and Modern Folk Storytellers]. In: Traditsii i sovremennost’ v fol’klore [Traditions and Modernity in Folklore]. Moscow: Nauka. Pp. 113–152. In Russian.

Dobrovolskaya V. E. (2015) Istoriya fiksatsii “Zhena uzha” (425M) u russkikh [The History of Recording “The Wife of the Snake” (425M) by Russians]. Traditsionnaya kul’tura [Traditional Culture]. 2015. No. 4. Pp. 133–142. In Russian.

Dobrovolskaya V. E. (2017) Syuzhet “Amur i Psikheya” (SUS 425A) v russkoi skazochnoi traditsii [The Plot of “Cupid and Psyche” (SUS 425A) in the Russian Fairy-Tale Tradition]. Traditsionnaya kul’tura [Traditional Culture]. 2017. No. 3. Pp. 139–150. In Russian.

Dobrovolskaya V. E. (2018a) “Orekhovaya vetochka”: redaktsiya syuzhetnogo tipa SUS 425S “Alen’kii tsvetochek” [“Nut Branch”: Editing of the Plot Type SUS 425C “Scarlet Flower”]. In: Iz istorii russkoi fol’kloristiki: Sravnitel’nye metody i podkhody v izuchenii narodnogo poeticheskogo tvorchestva: K yubileyu Yu. A. Novikova [From the History of Russian Folklore: Comparative Methods and Approaches in the Study of Folk Poetic Creativity: On the Anniversary of Yu. A. Novikov]. St. Petersburg: Svoe izdatel’stvo. Pp. 226–238. In Russian.

Dobrovolskaya V. E. (2018b) Muzhskaya skazochnaya traditsiya v Rossii: skazochnyi kanon i individual’noe nachalo (XIX–XXI vv.) [The Male Fairy-Tale Tradition in Russia: The FairyTale Canon and Individualism (Nineteenth — ​ Twenty-First Centuries)]. Traditsionnaya kul’tura [Traditional Culture]. 2018. No. 5. Pp. 175– 187. In Russian.

Korovina N. S. (2013) Tipologiya vzaimodeistviya komi i russkikh volshebnykh skazok (syuzhetnyi sostav, khudozhestvenno-stilevaya struktura) [Typology of Interaction Between Komi and Russian Fairy Tales (Plot Composition, Artistic and Stylistic Structure)]. Syktyvkar: IYaLI Komi NTs UrO RAN. In Russian.

Kostyukhin E. A. (1993) Skazki i tipologiya kul’turnykh kontaktov [Fairy Tales and the Typology of Cultural Contacts]. In: Russkii fol’klor: Mezhetnicheskie fol’klornye svyazi [Russian Folklore: Interethnic Folklore Connections]. St. Petersburg: Nauka. Vol. XXVII. Pp. 3–13. In Russian.

Lyzlova A. S. (2019) Syuzhetnyi tip 510V “Svinoi chekhol” v skazochnoi traditsii Karelii [Plot Type 510B “Pigskin Cover” in the Folktale Tradition of Karelia]. Traditsionnaya kul’tura [Traditional Culture]. 2019. No. 1. Pp. 31–41. In Russian.

Pomerantseva E. V. (1965) Sud’by russkoi skazki [The Fate of a Russian Fairy Tale]. Moscow: Nauka. In Russian. Pomerantseva E. V. (1979) Russkaya skazka v ustnom repertuare komi [The Russian Fairy Tale in the Oral Repertoire of the Komi Republic]. Sovetskaya etnografiya [Soviet Ethnography]. 1979. No. 6. Pp. 32–44. In Russian.

Pomerantseva E. V. (1988) K voprosu o natsional’nom i internatsional’nom v narodnykh skazkakh: (Na materiale syuzheta “Nevernaya zhena”) [To the Issue of the National and International Elements in Folktales (Based on the Story “The Unfaithful Wife”)]. In: Pisateli i skazochniki [Writers and Storytellers], by E. V. Pomerantseva. Moscow: Sovetskii pisatel’. Pp. 187–227. In Russian.

Pozdeeva A. N. (2018) Sravnitel’nyi analiz syuzhetnogo tipa SUS 314 “Chudesnoe begstvo s pomoshch’yu konya” v pol’skoi i russkoi volshebnoi skazke [Comparative Analysis of Plot Type SUS 314 “A Wonderful Escape with the Help of a Horse” in a Polish and Russian Fairy Tale]. In: Sbornik materialov X Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Collection of Materials of the X International Scholarly and Practical Conference]. Cheboksary: ChGU im. I. N. Ul’yanova. Pp. 200–205. In Russian.

Propp V. Ya. (1998) Istoricheskie korni volshebnoi skazki [Historical Roots of the Fairy Tale]. In: Sobranie trudov [Collected Works], by V. Ya. Propp. Moscow: Labirint. Pp. 112–436. In Russian.

For citation

Korovina N. S. Tradition and Modernity in the Work of Komi Storytellers (SUS 502 “Copper Forehead”). Traditional Culture. 2021. Vol. 22. No. 3. Pp. 66–78. In Russian.