An Area of Regulated Cultural Management in Altai: A Suggested Solution to the Problem of Ethnic Tourism

Альманах
Key words
Altai, sustainable tourism, culture appropriation, protected areas, traditional knowledge
Author
Maxim S. Mikhalev
About the Author
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5695-6915
E-mail: maxmikhalev@yahoo.com Tel.: +7 (495) 250-61-18
16–1, Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125047, Russian Federation
DSc in History, Professor, Teaching Scientific Center of Social Anthropology, Russian State University for the Humanities
Received
Date of publication
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26158/TK.2022.23.2.010
Acknowledgements

The article was prepared within the framework of the project “The Role of the Ethnic Factor in Ensuring the National Security of the Russian Federation and the Socio-Economic Development of the Border Territories of Siberia and the Far East” (part of the program for fundamental and applied scientific research “Ethnocultural Diversity of Russian Society and the Strengthening of All-Russian Identity,” 2020–2022).

Body

This paper draws attention to the problem of traditional culture being exploited for commercial purposes in Altai. The problem is intensifying as the development of large-scale tourism is being promoted here, especially in the form of so-called “ethnic tourism” that entails the objectification and commoditization of certain of its aspects. The author proposes an alternative approach, advocating a sustainable tourism based on the regulation of commercial or investment activity related to traditional culture and relying on local resources and traditional practices. The author suggests that the necessary condition for such a paradigm shift is the creation of a distinct territory of regulated cultural exploitation. To achieve this, he advocates consulting and cooperation with ecological activists, while at the same time warning against imposing their values and methods on the locals. Instead, control over protecting the traditional heritage should be returned to its proprietors, the indigenous people. The article concludes with the hope that such protected areas can become effective harbors for traditional culture.

References

Dorji T. (2001) Sustainability of Tourism in Bhutan. Journal of Bhutan Studies. 2001. Vol. 3. No. 1. Pp. 84–104. In English.

Kuleshova M. E. (2019) Normativno-pravovye aspekty sokhraneniya kul’turnykh landshaftov Rossii [Normative-Legal Aspects of the Preservation of Cultural Landscapes in Russia]. Chelovek: Obraz i sushchnost’. Gumanitarnye aspekty [The Human: Image and Essence. Humanitarian Aspects]. 2019. No. 1 (36). Pp. 133–153. In Russian.

Scott J. (2017) Iskusstvo byt’ nepodvlastnym. Anarkhistskaya istoriya vysokogorii Yugo-Vostochnoi Azii [The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of the Upland Southeast Asia]. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo. In Russian.

Shodoev N. A. (2009) Osnovy altaiskoi filosofii [The Basics of Altai Philosophy]. Biisk: Tipografiya IP Kudrin E. I. In Russian.

Terner V. (1983) Simvol i ritual [Symbol and Ritual]. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. In Russian

For citation

Mikhalev M. S. An Area of Regulated Cultural Management in Altai: A Suggested Solution to the Problem of Ethnic Tourism. Traditional Culture. 2022. Vol. 23. No. 2. Pp. 120–130. In Russian.